Civil Lawsuits

Federal Program Fraud

Alabama Federal Program Fraud Attorneys handling criminal cases nationally

What is Federal Program Fraud?

This is the term given to the form of white collar crime perpetrated in areas involving federal funds.  It does not necessarily mean that federal funds are actually stolen, only that federal funds were involved in some manner.  The crime’s connection to federal funds is often tenuous, giving good criminal attorneys arguments as to why the charges should not apply.

18 U.S.C. §666 is the federal statute that makes it a federal crime to steal federal money distributed through a federal program.  In addition, this statute criminalizes the misapplication of property or services from State or local governments or other entity that receives federal money.

To secure a charge or conviction for Federal Programs Fraud, 18 U.S.C. §666 requires federal prosecutors to show:

  1. The defendant is an agent of an organization or of a state, local or Indian tribal government;
  2. That the organization, government or agency receives benefits in excess of $10,000 in a one-year period pursuant to a Federal program involving a grant, a contract, a subsidy, a loan, a guarantee, insurance, or another form of Federal assistance;
  3. That the Defendant embezzled, stole, obtained by fraud, or otherwise without authority knowingly converted to the use of any person other than the rightful owner, or intentionally misapplied property that has a value of more than $5,000; and
  4. The property was owned by or under the care, custody or control of such organization, government or agency.

It is clear that this statute was intended to apply to the actual theft of federal funds provided to any organization or state or municipal government.  The defenses often raised in such federal programs fraud cases include:

  1. Did the organization receive federal funds?
  2. Was the defendant an agent of the organization?
  3. Did the defendant knowingly take federal funds or knowingly misapply property?
  4. Was there a legitimate purpose for the Defendant to take the federal funds or use the property?

However, prosecutors have extended the federal programs fraud statute to other cases, such as public corruption and bribery cases.  Their theory is that an elected official, as an agent of a state or municipal government that receives money from the federal government (through highway funds, or school funds) commits federal programs fraud by selling their influence or their vote.   Whether this statute was intended to apply to such behavior remains a point of contention among federal programs fraud attorneys.

At Boles Holmes White, we have experience in representing those charged with federal programs fraud, and have obtained “not guilty” verdicts on these charges.  If you are the target of a federal programs fraud charge or if you’ve been indicted criminally, give us a call.  Whether you are located in Alabama, New York, the District of Columbia or anywhere in the country, our federal programs fraud attorneys would like to help you.

Federal Cases
Charges
Verdict
USA vs. Edwards
Tax Evasion
Probation
USA vs.McLemore
Government Benefits Fraud
Probation
USA vs. Smith
Wire Fraud, Mail Fraud, Honest Services Fraud, Bribery, Federal Programs Fraud, Money Laundering
NOT Guilty All 19 Counts
USA vs. Dyer
Bank Fraud
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Scrushy
36 Counts Conspiracy Wire Fraud Mail Fraud Sarbanes-Oakley Money Laundering
NOT Guilty on All Counts
USA vs. Conn
Wire Fraud Federal Contract Fraud
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Abercrombie
Theft of Government Funds
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Grimes
Wire Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Nemish
Bank Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Phillips
Bank Fraud
Reduced
USA vs. Bond and Benefield
Rackateering Wire Fraud Conspiracy
1 Year Probation Dismissed on Government motion
USA vs. Johnson
Theft
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Mershon
Wire Fraud
Charges Dismissed
USA vs. Johnson
Government Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Khan
Interstate Terrorist Threat
Dismissed
USA vs. Taaid
Eastern District of Michigan Healthcare Fraud
Negotiated Plea
USA vs. Lam
Tuscon, Arizona Largest U.S. Counterfeit Case
Negotiated Plea
USA vs. Kennedy
Mail Fraud Money Laundering
Diversion
State Cases
Charges
Verdict
State vs. Khan
Arson
NOT Guilty
State vs. Moore
Theft of Property I
NOT Guilty
State vs. Alderman
Theft of Property I
NOT Guilty
State vs. Kilpatrick
Conspiracy Perjury
Plea to Obstruction of Justice
Theft Cases
Charges
Verdict
State v. Griffin
Bribery
Hung Jury (twice)
State v. Uber
Theft by Deception
NOT Guilty
State v. Berry
Possession of Forged Instrument 1st
NOT Guilty
State v. Graham
Theft of Property – 7 counts
NOT Guilty all counts
State v. Herring
Theft of Property – 30 misdemeanor counts
NOT Guilty all counts
State v. Woodham
Theft
Dismissed
State v. Eriksson
Embezzlement
Mistrial
State v. Whitley
Receiving Stolen Property with numerous priors

Negotiated Plea

Speak to an Attorney

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Other Personal Practice Areas

Civil Lawsuits >